<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (1) TMI 46 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37391</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the revenue, deciding that the interest income credited to the minor sons&#039; accounts, arising from accumulated profits treated as loan deposits, must be included in the assessee&#039;s income under section 64(1)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court emphasized a strict interpretation of section 64 and relevant judicial precedents, highlighting that the partnership deed&#039;s provisions could not change the fundamental nature of accumulated profits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 13:31:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75937" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (1) TMI 46 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37391</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the revenue, deciding that the interest income credited to the minor sons&#039; accounts, arising from accumulated profits treated as loan deposits, must be included in the assessee&#039;s income under section 64(1)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court emphasized a strict interpretation of section 64 and relevant judicial precedents, highlighting that the partnership deed&#039;s provisions could not change the fundamental nature of accumulated profits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>