<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 413 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755193</link>
    <description>HC allowed the writ petition challenging a GST demand order of Rs. 4,86,911.70. Despite procedural limitations, the court exercised discretion to quash the impugned order and remit the case back to the respondent. The petitioner was granted 30 days to file a reply, with instructions for the respondent to pass fresh orders within three months, ensuring the petitioner&#039;s opportunity to be heard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 16:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=759333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 413 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755193</link>
      <description>HC allowed the writ petition challenging a GST demand order of Rs. 4,86,911.70. Despite procedural limitations, the court exercised discretion to quash the impugned order and remit the case back to the respondent. The petitioner was granted 30 days to file a reply, with instructions for the respondent to pass fresh orders within three months, ensuring the petitioner&#039;s opportunity to be heard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755193</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>