<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 407 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755187</link>
    <description>HC ruled that the show cause notice for denying transitional tax credit was insufficient. The court directed the tax authority to provide clear reasons for credit denial within two weeks, allowed the petitioner two weeks to respond, and mandated a personal hearing before issuing a fresh order. The impugned order was set aside, giving the petitioner an opportunity to contest the tax demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 11:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=759324" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 407 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755187</link>
      <description>HC ruled that the show cause notice for denying transitional tax credit was insufficient. The court directed the tax authority to provide clear reasons for credit denial within two weeks, allowed the petitioner two weeks to respond, and mandated a personal hearing before issuing a fresh order. The impugned order was set aside, giving the petitioner an opportunity to contest the tax demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>