<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 397 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755177</link>
    <description>ITAT Ahmedabad ruled on multiple issues in a transfer pricing case. The tribunal deleted TP adjustments for interest on loans to associated enterprises, finding the TPO incorrectly calculated interest for the entire 180-day period when loans were advanced in installments. Corporate guarantee fee adjustment was restricted to 0.5% based on banking commission rates. The tribunal upheld CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of disallowances under section 36(1)(iii) for interest-free advances, confirming sufficient interest-free funds existed. Weighted deduction under section 35(2AB) at 150% for R&amp;amp;D expenses was allowed, with product registration expenses treated as revenue expenditure. The tribunal dismissed revenue&#039;s appeals on section 14A disallowance restriction and foreign exchange loss treatment as business loss rather than speculation loss.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2024 07:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=759306" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 397 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755177</link>
      <description>ITAT Ahmedabad ruled on multiple issues in a transfer pricing case. The tribunal deleted TP adjustments for interest on loans to associated enterprises, finding the TPO incorrectly calculated interest for the entire 180-day period when loans were advanced in installments. Corporate guarantee fee adjustment was restricted to 0.5% based on banking commission rates. The tribunal upheld CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of disallowances under section 36(1)(iii) for interest-free advances, confirming sufficient interest-free funds existed. Weighted deduction under section 35(2AB) at 150% for R&amp;amp;D expenses was allowed, with product registration expenses treated as revenue expenditure. The tribunal dismissed revenue&#039;s appeals on section 14A disallowance restriction and foreign exchange loss treatment as business loss rather than speculation loss.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755177</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>