<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (7) TMI 53 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37384</link>
    <description>The Karnataka High Court considered whether a waived advance became taxable income in the previous year ending 31 March 1966. It held that the waiver was not firmly committed by the creditor until 16 April 1966, so the amount accrued only after the close of the accounting year 1965-66 and not in the relevant previous year for assessment year 1966-67. On that basis, the waived sum could not be assessed as the assessee&#039;s income for that year, and the answer was against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 13:20:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (7) TMI 53 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37384</link>
      <description>The Karnataka High Court considered whether a waived advance became taxable income in the previous year ending 31 March 1966. It held that the waiver was not firmly committed by the creditor until 16 April 1966, so the amount accrued only after the close of the accounting year 1965-66 and not in the relevant previous year for assessment year 1966-67. On that basis, the waived sum could not be assessed as the assessee&#039;s income for that year, and the answer was against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37384</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>