<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 392 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755172</link>
    <description>The HC quashed the CESTAT order dated 10th February 2022, which upheld duty demands and interest on goods cleared into the DTA using SFIS credit scrips. The HC found CESTAT exceeded its scope by relying on unraised provisions. The case was remanded to CESTAT for a fresh decision, to be resolved by 31st December 2024.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 08:40:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=759296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 392 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755172</link>
      <description>The HC quashed the CESTAT order dated 10th February 2022, which upheld duty demands and interest on goods cleared into the DTA using SFIS credit scrips. The HC found CESTAT exceeded its scope by relying on unraised provisions. The case was remanded to CESTAT for a fresh decision, to be resolved by 31st December 2024.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755172</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>