<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 381 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755161</link>
    <description>Unutilized PLA balance was treated as an advance deposit, not as excise duty, until it is actually appropriated towards duty payment. On that basis, refund of the unspent PLA amount was held outside Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, so the one-year limitation did not apply and the refund claim was not time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2024 09:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=759277" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 381 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755161</link>
      <description>Unutilized PLA balance was treated as an advance deposit, not as excise duty, until it is actually appropriated towards duty payment. On that basis, refund of the unspent PLA amount was held outside Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, so the one-year limitation did not apply and the refund claim was not time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755161</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>