https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456208 The court allowed the appeal, overturning the Additional District Judge's decision, and reinstated the Subordinate Judge's decree. It awarded the full amount to the plaintiff, emphasizing that Section 62 of the Contract Act does not apply post-breach. The defendant's failure to fulfill the new arrangement permitted the plaintiff to enforce the original bond. Costs were awarded to the plaintiff in all courts. en-us Wed, 11 Jan 1888 00:00:00 +0521 Sat, 06 Jul 2024 11:05:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456208 The court allowed the appeal, overturning the Additional District Judge's decision, and reinstated the Subordinate Judge's decree. It awarded the full amount to the plaintiff, emphasizing that Section 62 of the Contract Act does not apply post-breach. The defendant's failure to fulfill the new arrangement permitted the plaintiff to enforce the original bond. Costs were awarded to the plaintiff in all courts. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 11 Jan 1888 00:00:00 +0521 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456208