<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 362 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755142</link>
    <description>The HC set aside the impugned order dated 28.12.2023, citing breach of natural justice, and remanded the matter for reconsideration. The petitioner, a dealer, must remit 10% of the disputed tax demand and respond to the show cause notice within two months. The respondent is instructed to provide a personal hearing and issue a fresh order within two months. The case was disposed of with no order as to costs, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2024 17:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=759191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 362 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755142</link>
      <description>The HC set aside the impugned order dated 28.12.2023, citing breach of natural justice, and remanded the matter for reconsideration. The petitioner, a dealer, must remit 10% of the disputed tax demand and respond to the show cause notice within two months. The respondent is instructed to provide a personal hearing and issue a fresh order within two months. The case was disposed of with no order as to costs, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755142</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>