<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (4) TMI 25 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37373</link>
    <description>For section 64(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, a karta who is a partner in a firm is treated as an individual. On that construction, the share income of minor children admitted to the benefits of the partnership is clubbed with the income of that individual. The ruling therefore supports inclusion of the minors&#039; partnership income in the assessee&#039;s taxable income where the assessee was the firm&#039;s partner in a representative capacity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 12:59:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (4) TMI 25 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37373</link>
      <description>For section 64(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, a karta who is a partner in a firm is treated as an individual. On that construction, the share income of minor children admitted to the benefits of the partnership is clubbed with the income of that individual. The ruling therefore supports inclusion of the minors&#039; partnership income in the assessee&#039;s taxable income where the assessee was the firm&#039;s partner in a representative capacity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>