<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 329 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755109</link>
    <description>CESTAT Kolkata reduced penalty imposed on appellant under Section 114(i) of Customs Act, 1962 for complicity in attempted export of red sanders, a prohibited good. Tribunal found appellant maintained close business relationship with mastermind, facilitated export clearance, and acted as middleman between operators and exporters for monetary consideration. Despite appellant&#039;s claim of being commission agent, evidence showed direct involvement in procuring consignment and handing documents to customs broker. Tribunal upheld penalty but reduced amount to Rs.1,00,000 considering appellant&#039;s proportionate role. Appeal allowed in part.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2024 07:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=759155" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 329 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755109</link>
      <description>CESTAT Kolkata reduced penalty imposed on appellant under Section 114(i) of Customs Act, 1962 for complicity in attempted export of red sanders, a prohibited good. Tribunal found appellant maintained close business relationship with mastermind, facilitated export clearance, and acted as middleman between operators and exporters for monetary consideration. Despite appellant&#039;s claim of being commission agent, evidence showed direct involvement in procuring consignment and handing documents to customs broker. Tribunal upheld penalty but reduced amount to Rs.1,00,000 considering appellant&#039;s proportionate role. Appeal allowed in part.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755109</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>