<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Corporate debtor defaulted on operational dues, triggering CIRP. Winding-up petition didn&#039;t halt limitation sans govt consent.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79161</link>
    <description>Corporate debtor failed to repay operational creditors&#039; dues, leading to initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The issue pertained to the effect of a winding-up petition filed by the appellant on the limitation period. The NCLAT held that the limitation period would not be halted due to the High Court&#039;s order on the winding-up petition, as the appellant failed to seek the Central Government&#039;s consent to pursue recovery against the respondent, despite being granted liberty. The NCLAT found no error in the impugned order and dismissed the appeal, upholding the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision that ample time was available for the appellant to seek the required consent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2024 07:50:32 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2024 07:50:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=759133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Corporate debtor defaulted on operational dues, triggering CIRP. Winding-up petition didn&#039;t halt limitation sans govt consent.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79161</link>
      <description>Corporate debtor failed to repay operational creditors&#039; dues, leading to initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The issue pertained to the effect of a winding-up petition filed by the appellant on the limitation period. The NCLAT held that the limitation period would not be halted due to the High Court&#039;s order on the winding-up petition, as the appellant failed to seek the Central Government&#039;s consent to pursue recovery against the respondent, despite being granted liberty. The NCLAT found no error in the impugned order and dismissed the appeal, upholding the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision that ample time was available for the appellant to seek the required consent.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2024 07:50:32 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79161</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>