<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 310 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755090</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal due to the inapplicability of the extended period of limitation. It concluded that the show cause notice was barred by limitation, considering the 2016 investigation and subsequent communications. The Tribunal emphasized doubts about the taxability of the appellant&#039;s activity, granting consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2024 07:50:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=759122" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 310 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755090</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal due to the inapplicability of the extended period of limitation. It concluded that the show cause notice was barred by limitation, considering the 2016 investigation and subsequent communications. The Tribunal emphasized doubts about the taxability of the appellant&#039;s activity, granting consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>