<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 1140 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456205</link>
    <description>ITAT Ahmedabad remanded TDS u/s 195 matter to AO for fresh determination of expense nature and DTAA applicability after assessee raised new arguments regarding technical services versus independent personal services classification. Tribunal upheld CIT(A)&#039;s allowance of weighted deduction u/s 35(2AB) for R&amp;amp;D expenses, finding AO&#039;s disallowance unjustified when DSIR had approved capital expenditure. CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of s.40(a)(i) addition on USA legal services was sustained, as services didn&#039;t involve technical knowledge transfer under India-USA DTAA. Interest disallowance u/s 36(1)(iii) deletion was confirmed following precedent and business purpose demonstration. MAT adjustments for provisions were deleted following HC precedents where provisions reduced asset values rather than creating separate provision accounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2024 12:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=759095" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 1140 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456205</link>
      <description>ITAT Ahmedabad remanded TDS u/s 195 matter to AO for fresh determination of expense nature and DTAA applicability after assessee raised new arguments regarding technical services versus independent personal services classification. Tribunal upheld CIT(A)&#039;s allowance of weighted deduction u/s 35(2AB) for R&amp;amp;D expenses, finding AO&#039;s disallowance unjustified when DSIR had approved capital expenditure. CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of s.40(a)(i) addition on USA legal services was sustained, as services didn&#039;t involve technical knowledge transfer under India-USA DTAA. Interest disallowance u/s 36(1)(iii) deletion was confirmed following precedent and business purpose demonstration. MAT adjustments for provisions were deleted following HC precedents where provisions reduced asset values rather than creating separate provision accounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456205</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>