<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1332 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456207</link>
    <description>A show-cause notice in a duty demand matter was challenged on the ground that it had been issued without the pre-show-cause consultation required by the Master Circular where the demand exceeded the prescribed threshold. The procedural requirement of prior consultation was treated as mandatory before further steps could proceed, and the authorities were directed to undertake that consultation. The impugned notice was to remain in abeyance until the next hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2024 06:36:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=759093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1332 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456207</link>
      <description>A show-cause notice in a duty demand matter was challenged on the ground that it had been issued without the pre-show-cause consultation required by the Master Circular where the demand exceeded the prescribed threshold. The procedural requirement of prior consultation was treated as mandatory before further steps could proceed, and the authorities were directed to undertake that consultation. The impugned notice was to remain in abeyance until the next hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456207</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>