<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1507 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456195</link>
    <description>An unregistered sale deed that is also insufficiently stamped cannot be admitted in evidence unless it is duly stamped in the manner permitted by law. Section 35 of the Indian Stamp Act bars admission of an unstamped instrument, and Section 17 of the Registration Act requires compulsory registration for non-testamentary instruments affecting immovable property. Because the document was intended to convey title and suffered from both defects, the claimed irregularity was not curable by impounding the deed and later marking it after payment of stamp duty and penalty. The request to admit the document in evidence was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2024 06:35:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=759086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1507 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456195</link>
      <description>An unregistered sale deed that is also insufficiently stamped cannot be admitted in evidence unless it is duly stamped in the manner permitted by law. Section 35 of the Indian Stamp Act bars admission of an unstamped instrument, and Section 17 of the Registration Act requires compulsory registration for non-testamentary instruments affecting immovable property. Because the document was intended to convey title and suffered from both defects, the claimed irregularity was not curable by impounding the deed and later marking it after payment of stamp duty and penalty. The request to admit the document in evidence was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456195</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>