<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1523 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456199</link>
    <description>The HC addressed the challenge to the order-in-original levying service tax for 2014-15 and 2015-16, questioned for being beyond the limitation period. The court advised the petitioner to file an appeal under Section 85 of the Finance Act, 1994, and Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, within thirty days. The Writ Petition was disposed of, urging the petitioner to pursue the appellate remedy, with no costs imposed, and related miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2024 06:35:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=759082" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1523 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456199</link>
      <description>The HC addressed the challenge to the order-in-original levying service tax for 2014-15 and 2015-16, questioned for being beyond the limitation period. The court advised the petitioner to file an appeal under Section 85 of the Finance Act, 1994, and Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, within thirty days. The Writ Petition was disposed of, urging the petitioner to pursue the appellate remedy, with no costs imposed, and related miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456199</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>