<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 873 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456186</link>
    <description>The Kerala Tax on Luxuries Act, 1976 was upheld because the State&#039;s power to tax luxuries in hotels under Entry 62 of List II was held distinct from the Union power over services under Entry 92C of List I. Revised assessments under Section 6(5) were also sustained since the provision covered escaped turnover, the action was taken after the amendment came into force, and the objections of retrospectivity, change of opinion, limitation, and denial of hearing failed on the facts. Interest, however, was confined to the actual period of default after service of the assessment and demand notice, and could not be levied for the earlier period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2024 15:27:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=759053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 873 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456186</link>
      <description>The Kerala Tax on Luxuries Act, 1976 was upheld because the State&#039;s power to tax luxuries in hotels under Entry 62 of List II was held distinct from the Union power over services under Entry 92C of List I. Revised assessments under Section 6(5) were also sustained since the provision covered escaped turnover, the action was taken after the amendment came into force, and the objections of retrospectivity, change of opinion, limitation, and denial of hearing failed on the facts. Interest, however, was confined to the actual period of default after service of the assessment and demand notice, and could not be levied for the earlier period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>