<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 1004 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456185</link>
    <description>Disputed questions about whether a contract labour arrangement is genuine or a camouflage cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, because that requires evidence and factual adjudication by the proper forum. The High Court&#039;s direction to discontinue contract labour and absorb workers as permanent employees was therefore unsustainable on the material before it. The governing contract labour framework also does not permit automatic absorption merely because abolition of contract labour is considered or ordered; the appropriate Government must act within the statutory scheme, and factual disputes must be examined by the industrial adjudicator or other competent authority. The impugned judgment was set aside and the union was left to pursue remedies before the appropriate authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2024 14:53:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=759052" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 1004 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456185</link>
      <description>Disputed questions about whether a contract labour arrangement is genuine or a camouflage cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, because that requires evidence and factual adjudication by the proper forum. The High Court&#039;s direction to discontinue contract labour and absorb workers as permanent employees was therefore unsustainable on the material before it. The governing contract labour framework also does not permit automatic absorption merely because abolition of contract labour is considered or ordered; the appropriate Government must act within the statutory scheme, and factual disputes must be examined by the industrial adjudicator or other competent authority. The impugned judgment was set aside and the union was left to pursue remedies before the appropriate authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456185</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>