<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (11) TMI 12 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37358</link>
    <description>A reassessment made after a limited remand is confined to the matters actually remitted for reconsideration, and the assessing authority cannot reopen issues that were not appealed against or were left undisturbed. The appellate order here was treated as a partial remand only on speculative losses, while the loom-hour receipt issue had attained finality. A later Supreme Court ruling did not expand the scope of the remand or permit a fresh plea on that concluded issue. The assessee&#039;s new claim was therefore not entertainable in the reassessment proceedings, and the question was answered in favour of the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 12:24:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75904" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (11) TMI 12 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37358</link>
      <description>A reassessment made after a limited remand is confined to the matters actually remitted for reconsideration, and the assessing authority cannot reopen issues that were not appealed against or were left undisturbed. The appellate order here was treated as a partial remand only on speculative losses, while the loom-hour receipt issue had attained finality. A later Supreme Court ruling did not expand the scope of the remand or permit a fresh plea on that concluded issue. The assessee&#039;s new claim was therefore not entertainable in the reassessment proceedings, and the question was answered in favour of the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37358</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>