<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 291 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755071</link>
    <description>HC dismissed the writ petition challenging a GST order dated 22/11/2023 under section-73. The court found no procedural irregularities, emphasized the petitioner&#039;s failure to provide satisfactory explanations, and directed the petitioner to pursue statutory remedies under Section 107 of the GST Act. The order was upheld, allowing the respondents&#039; original assessment to stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 16:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=759014" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 291 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755071</link>
      <description>HC dismissed the writ petition challenging a GST order dated 22/11/2023 under section-73. The court found no procedural irregularities, emphasized the petitioner&#039;s failure to provide satisfactory explanations, and directed the petitioner to pursue statutory remedies under Section 107 of the GST Act. The order was upheld, allowing the respondents&#039; original assessment to stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>