<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Highlights Need for Nexus Between Expenses and Exempt Income u/s 14A, Rule 8D; Upholds Deletion of Bogus Capital Loss.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79135</link>
    <description>Necessity of establishing nexus between expenditure incurred and earning of exempt income u/s 14A read with Rule 8D. Mechanical application of Rule 8D without recording requisite satisfaction violates procedural requirement u/s 14A(2). Disallowance restricted to exempt income earned. Deletion of addition for bogus long-term capital loss upheld due to lack of substantial evidence and failure to provide opportunity for cross-verification. Addition of speculation loss claimed under &quot;income from other sources&quot; dismissed as it represented depreciation related to speculation business, properly accounted for with nullifying effect on returned income. Procedural lapses by Assessing Officer noted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2024 08:20:48 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2024 08:20:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=758994" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Highlights Need for Nexus Between Expenses and Exempt Income u/s 14A, Rule 8D; Upholds Deletion of Bogus Capital Loss.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79135</link>
      <description>Necessity of establishing nexus between expenditure incurred and earning of exempt income u/s 14A read with Rule 8D. Mechanical application of Rule 8D without recording requisite satisfaction violates procedural requirement u/s 14A(2). Disallowance restricted to exempt income earned. Deletion of addition for bogus long-term capital loss upheld due to lack of substantial evidence and failure to provide opportunity for cross-verification. Addition of speculation loss claimed under &quot;income from other sources&quot; dismissed as it represented depreciation related to speculation business, properly accounted for with nullifying effect on returned income. Procedural lapses by Assessing Officer noted.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2024 08:20:48 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79135</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>