https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755049 CESTAT Allahabad held that ex-gratia amounts received do not attract service tax under Section 66E of the Finance Act, 1994. Following precedent in K.N. Food Industries case, the Tribunal ruled that ex-gratia payments made to compensate for damages, losses, or injuries from unintended events do not constitute payment for services, as they do not arise from any obligation to tolerate acts or situations. The impugned order was set aside and appeal was allowed. en-us Thu, 04 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Jul 2024 08:20:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755049 CESTAT Allahabad held that ex-gratia amounts received do not attract service tax under Section 66E of the Finance Act, 1994. Following precedent in K.N. Food Industries case, the Tribunal ruled that ex-gratia payments made to compensate for damages, losses, or injuries from unintended events do not constitute payment for services, as they do not arise from any obligation to tolerate acts or situations. The impugned order was set aside and appeal was allowed. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 04 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755049