https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755046 The HC of Calcutta dismissed the revenue's appeal against the CESTAT, Kolkata's decision, affirming that the respondent's activities constituted 'manufacture of excisable goods' under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal's decision on the respondent's eligibility for Cenvat Credit on duty-paid input machineries was upheld, with the HC finding no substantial question of law. en-us Fri, 03 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Jul 2024 08:19:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755046 The HC of Calcutta dismissed the revenue's appeal against the CESTAT, Kolkata's decision, affirming that the respondent's activities constituted 'manufacture of excisable goods' under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal's decision on the respondent's eligibility for Cenvat Credit on duty-paid input machineries was upheld, with the HC finding no substantial question of law. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 03 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755046