<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 264 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755044</link>
    <description>Mixing and blending MS and HSD with MFA to produce Xtra Premium and Xtra Mile did not amount to manufacture, because the process merely improved marketability and added value without bringing about manufacture in law. Following the binding decision in the assessee&#039;s own earlier case, affirmed by the Supreme Court, the Tribunal held that the excise demand was unsustainable and upheld the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2024 17:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=758967" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 264 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755044</link>
      <description>Mixing and blending MS and HSD with MFA to produce Xtra Premium and Xtra Mile did not amount to manufacture, because the process merely improved marketability and added value without bringing about manufacture in law. Following the binding decision in the assessee&#039;s own earlier case, affirmed by the Supreme Court, the Tribunal held that the excise demand was unsustainable and upheld the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>