<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 264 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755044</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal concerning the respondent&#039;s mixing of MS and HSD to create new products was dismissed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, ruling in favor of the respondent. It cited precedent establishing that the process in question does not constitute manufacturing under applicable legal standards.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2024 17:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=758967" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 264 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755044</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal concerning the respondent&#039;s mixing of MS and HSD to create new products was dismissed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, ruling in favor of the respondent. It cited precedent establishing that the process in question does not constitute manufacturing under applicable legal standards.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>