<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 263 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755043</link>
    <description>Section 482 CrPC is a discretionary remedy and should not be used to bypass revision under Section 397 or to overcome inordinate delay and laches, particularly where the accused allowed the proceedings to continue and approached the High Court only at a late stage. In cheque dishonour matters under Sections 138 and 142 of the NI Act, alleged non-accrual of liability, defective notice, presentation of cheques, security-cheque character, resignation of directors, and double jeopardy are fact-sensitive objections that ordinarily require evidence and are not suitable for quashing at the pre-trial stage. The complaints and summoning orders were therefore left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2024 12:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=758965" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 263 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755043</link>
      <description>Section 482 CrPC is a discretionary remedy and should not be used to bypass revision under Section 397 or to overcome inordinate delay and laches, particularly where the accused allowed the proceedings to continue and approached the High Court only at a late stage. In cheque dishonour matters under Sections 138 and 142 of the NI Act, alleged non-accrual of liability, defective notice, presentation of cheques, security-cheque character, resignation of directors, and double jeopardy are fact-sensitive objections that ordinarily require evidence and are not suitable for quashing at the pre-trial stage. The complaints and summoning orders were therefore left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755043</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>