<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 1598 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456176</link>
    <description>ITAT Panaji upheld multiple determinations in favor of the assessee. The tribunal confirmed that share trading income constituted business income rather than STCG based on transaction magnitude and circumstances. For TDS under section 195, no liability existed as payments to non-residents occurred before relevant 2010 amendments took effect. Contributions to school construction and temple renovation were allowed as revenue expenditure, being necessary for maintaining cordial relations with local communities around mining operations. The tribunal also upheld allowance of foreign exchange fluctuation losses on EEFC account sales, distinguishing the case from CBDT circular restrictions on derivative losses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2024 23:20:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=758958" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 1598 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456176</link>
      <description>ITAT Panaji upheld multiple determinations in favor of the assessee. The tribunal confirmed that share trading income constituted business income rather than STCG based on transaction magnitude and circumstances. For TDS under section 195, no liability existed as payments to non-residents occurred before relevant 2010 amendments took effect. Contributions to school construction and temple renovation were allowed as revenue expenditure, being necessary for maintaining cordial relations with local communities around mining operations. The tribunal also upheld allowance of foreign exchange fluctuation losses on EEFC account sales, distinguishing the case from CBDT circular restrictions on derivative losses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>