<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1725 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456180</link>
    <description>Bombay HC dismissed a society&#039;s suit seeking declaration of invalidity of a lease deed allegedly executed by its President without authority. The court held that the society&#039;s charter authorized the President to represent it in all matters, with only restrictions on important subjects requiring Administrative Body resolution. Since no constitutional restriction existed on creating property leases, third parties need not inquire into internal management procedures once authority is established. Under Evidence Act Section 106, the burden of proving lack of authority regarding internal statutes lay with the plaintiff society, which failed to discharge this burden.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2024 23:20:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=758954" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1725 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456180</link>
      <description>Bombay HC dismissed a society&#039;s suit seeking declaration of invalidity of a lease deed allegedly executed by its President without authority. The court held that the society&#039;s charter authorized the President to represent it in all matters, with only restrictions on important subjects requiring Administrative Body resolution. Since no constitutional restriction existed on creating property leases, third parties need not inquire into internal management procedures once authority is established. Under Evidence Act Section 106, the burden of proving lack of authority regarding internal statutes lay with the plaintiff society, which failed to discharge this burden.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>