https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456182 Where an impugned order is revisable under Section 397 CrPC, a petition under Section 482 CrPC is not maintainable unless extraordinary circumstances are shown to prevent abuse of process or secure the ends of justice. The High Court treated the revisional remedy as the appropriate statutory course and held that the inherent power under Section 482 is residuary, extraordinary, and to be exercised sparingly. On the facts pleaded, no specific material established any exceptional circumstance justifying bypass of the revisional remedy, and a bare assertion of territorial jurisdiction did not suffice. The petition was therefore held not maintainable and the petitioners were relegated to revision. en-us Thu, 14 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Jul 2024 23:20:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456182 Where an impugned order is revisable under Section 397 CrPC, a petition under Section 482 CrPC is not maintainable unless extraordinary circumstances are shown to prevent abuse of process or secure the ends of justice. The High Court treated the revisional remedy as the appropriate statutory course and held that the inherent power under Section 482 is residuary, extraordinary, and to be exercised sparingly. On the facts pleaded, no specific material established any exceptional circumstance justifying bypass of the revisional remedy, and a bare assertion of territorial jurisdiction did not suffice. The petition was therefore held not maintainable and the petitioners were relegated to revision. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 14 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456182