<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (11) TMI 114 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456169</link>
    <description>A promissory note fixing payment at a future date is not payable on demand; if the stamp affixed is insufficient, the instrument is inadmissible in evidence under the Stamp Act. Even so, where the note was executed in acknowledgment of an antecedent debt and recites prior receipt of money, the creditor may sue on the original debt as the independent cause of action. The exclusion of the instrument does not bar proof of the pre-existing liability, and Section 91 does not prevent reliance on that antecedent obligation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2024 14:16:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=758850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (11) TMI 114 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456169</link>
      <description>A promissory note fixing payment at a future date is not payable on demand; if the stamp affixed is insufficient, the instrument is inadmissible in evidence under the Stamp Act. Even so, where the note was executed in acknowledgment of an antecedent debt and recites prior receipt of money, the creditor may sue on the original debt as the independent cause of action. The exclusion of the instrument does not bar proof of the pre-existing liability, and Section 91 does not prevent reliance on that antecedent obligation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456169</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>