<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (11) TMI 431 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456164</link>
    <description>The integrated Orissa Administrative Service Class II seniority structure based on year of allotment was treated as a settled service arrangement, and the earlier Full Bench view, left undisturbed after dismissal of the special leave petition, was not reopened. Section 3(2)(a) of the Orissa Administrative Services Class II (Appointment of Officers Validation) Act, 1986 was held invalid insofar as it gave deemed seniority to 1972 promotees over direct recruits of 1972 while preserving the position of direct recruits of 1970 and 1971, because the differentiation lacked a rational basis and offended Article 14. The separate seniority dispute concerning the 1973 direct recruit was left to be decided in the pending Tribunal proceeding.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2024 11:36:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=758841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (11) TMI 431 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456164</link>
      <description>The integrated Orissa Administrative Service Class II seniority structure based on year of allotment was treated as a settled service arrangement, and the earlier Full Bench view, left undisturbed after dismissal of the special leave petition, was not reopened. Section 3(2)(a) of the Orissa Administrative Services Class II (Appointment of Officers Validation) Act, 1986 was held invalid insofar as it gave deemed seniority to 1972 promotees over direct recruits of 1972 while preserving the position of direct recruits of 1970 and 1971, because the differentiation lacked a rational basis and offended Article 14. The separate seniority dispute concerning the 1973 direct recruit was left to be decided in the pending Tribunal proceeding.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456164</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>