https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456163 Daily rated or casual workers in a government company do not acquire a vested right to regularization, pay parity, or absorption merely because they have completed 240 days of work or rendered long service; regularization depends on the governing rules and any applicable settlement terms. In the absence of a statutory rule or sanctioned post, the court cannot direct creation of posts, continuation in service, absorption, or payment of regular salary, as such directions would intrude into executive functions. The stated position is that claims beyond the settlement framework are unsustainable without legal authority. en-us Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Jul 2024 11:32:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456163 Daily rated or casual workers in a government company do not acquire a vested right to regularization, pay parity, or absorption merely because they have completed 240 days of work or rendered long service; regularization depends on the governing rules and any applicable settlement terms. In the absence of a statutory rule or sanctioned post, the court cannot direct creation of posts, continuation in service, absorption, or payment of regular salary, as such directions would intrude into executive functions. The stated position is that claims beyond the settlement framework are unsustainable without legal authority. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456163