https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456162 Appointments made on an ad hoc or temporary basis outside the prescribed recruitment rules could not be regularized, because regularization cannot cure an appointment made contrary to the constitutional requirement of equal opportunity in public employment. Service continued only under interim court orders was not treated as compliant service, and the doctrine of equal pay for equal work did not create a right to permanency or regular appointment. The exception for irregular appointments in Umadevi was held inapplicable because the required period of service was not completed without court intervention. The directions granting service benefits and continuation were therefore set aside. en-us Thu, 10 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Jul 2024 11:24:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456162 Appointments made on an ad hoc or temporary basis outside the prescribed recruitment rules could not be regularized, because regularization cannot cure an appointment made contrary to the constitutional requirement of equal opportunity in public employment. Service continued only under interim court orders was not treated as compliant service, and the doctrine of equal pay for equal work did not create a right to permanency or regular appointment. The exception for irregular appointments in Umadevi was held inapplicable because the required period of service was not completed without court intervention. The directions granting service benefits and continuation were therefore set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 10 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456162