https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456160 The SC dismissed the petition, ruling that the petitioner cannot claim infringement of fundamental rights under Art. 32 of the Constitution. The decision of competent authorities under the Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950, declaring the petitioner's husband an evacuee, became final due to the petitioner's failure to challenge it in the appropriate forum. Consequently, the petitioner is precluded from contesting the orders on merits through a writ petition. The Court emphasized the necessity of timely and appropriate legal challenges, dismissing the petition with costs. en-us Wed, 22 Mar 1961 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Jul 2024 11:04:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456160 The SC dismissed the petition, ruling that the petitioner cannot claim infringement of fundamental rights under Art. 32 of the Constitution. The decision of competent authorities under the Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950, declaring the petitioner's husband an evacuee, became final due to the petitioner's failure to challenge it in the appropriate forum. Consequently, the petitioner is precluded from contesting the orders on merits through a writ petition. The Court emphasized the necessity of timely and appropriate legal challenges, dismissing the petition with costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 22 Mar 1961 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456160