<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 248 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755028</link>
    <description>Calcutta HC set aside appellate authority&#039;s rejection of GST appeal filed under Section 107 of West Bengal/Central GST Act, 2017. Petitioner filed appeal six months and twelve days late, claiming inability to view SCN on portal prevented timely filing. Appellate authority mechanically rejected without considering petitioner&#039;s explanation for delay. HC found order perverse, noting appellate authority failed to consider petitioner&#039;s lack of knowledge about the order. Relying on precedent, HC held appellate authority competent to condone delay beyond prescribed one-month period. Matter remanded with direction to hear appeal on merits within eight weeks after condoning delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 17:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=758818" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 248 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755028</link>
      <description>Calcutta HC set aside appellate authority&#039;s rejection of GST appeal filed under Section 107 of West Bengal/Central GST Act, 2017. Petitioner filed appeal six months and twelve days late, claiming inability to view SCN on portal prevented timely filing. Appellate authority mechanically rejected without considering petitioner&#039;s explanation for delay. HC found order perverse, noting appellate authority failed to consider petitioner&#039;s lack of knowledge about the order. Relying on precedent, HC held appellate authority competent to condone delay beyond prescribed one-month period. Matter remanded with direction to hear appeal on merits within eight weeks after condoning delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755028</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>