https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755011 Anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC was refused because the FIR allegations, along with the circumstances and the seriousness and gravity of the offences under the IPC, weighed against pre-arrest protection. The court nevertheless granted a limited protective direction to allow the petitioner to surrender before the jurisdictional court within the time fixed and seek bail on terms to be decided by that court, with deposit of costs. Anticipatory bail was therefore declined, but surrender and consideration of regular bail were left open before the competent court. en-us Mon, 08 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Jul 2024 08:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755011 Anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC was refused because the FIR allegations, along with the circumstances and the seriousness and gravity of the offences under the IPC, weighed against pre-arrest protection. The court nevertheless granted a limited protective direction to allow the petitioner to surrender before the jurisdictional court within the time fixed and seek bail on terms to be decided by that court, with deposit of costs. Anticipatory bail was therefore declined, but surrender and consideration of regular bail were left open before the competent court. Case-Laws GST Mon, 08 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755011