https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79081 The High Court addressed the issue of the relevant date for adjudicating claims in a liquidation scenario. The Court held that claims should be adjudicated up to the date of the provisional liquidator's appointment, not the final winding-up date. The Bank of Baroda had dual claims, one as a secured creditor and one as a Debenture Trustee. The applicant's claim settlement assertions were found factually incorrect as the Bank was entitled to recover a specific amount. Orders upholding these claims were not challenged and finalized. The Court dismissed the application, finding no errors warranting review. en-us Thu, 04 Jul 2024 08:16:11 +0530 Thu, 04 Jul 2024 08:16:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79081 The High Court addressed the issue of the relevant date for adjudicating claims in a liquidation scenario. The Court held that claims should be adjudicated up to the date of the provisional liquidator's appointment, not the final winding-up date. The Bank of Baroda had dual claims, one as a secured creditor and one as a Debenture Trustee. The applicant's claim settlement assertions were found factually incorrect as the Bank was entitled to recover a specific amount. Orders upholding these claims were not challenged and finalized. The Court dismissed the application, finding no errors warranting review. Highlights Companies Law Thu, 04 Jul 2024 08:16:11 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79081