<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 193 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754973</link>
    <description>The NCLAT dismissed an appeal challenging rejection of a Section 9 application under IBC. The operational creditor&#039;s claim fell short of the Rs. 1 crore threshold as the corporate debtor disputed interest liability. The NCLAT held that disputed interest amounts cannot be clubbed with principal debt to meet threshold requirements. Despite the appellant citing Prasat Agarwal case where stipulated invoice interest was allowed, the tribunal distinguished this case noting the corporate debtor had categorically contested and denied interest liability in both Section 8 notice reply and Section 9 application response. The disputed interest claim required adjudication by competent court, not CIRP initiation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2024 11:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=758741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 193 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754973</link>
      <description>The NCLAT dismissed an appeal challenging rejection of a Section 9 application under IBC. The operational creditor&#039;s claim fell short of the Rs. 1 crore threshold as the corporate debtor disputed interest liability. The NCLAT held that disputed interest amounts cannot be clubbed with principal debt to meet threshold requirements. Despite the appellant citing Prasat Agarwal case where stipulated invoice interest was allowed, the tribunal distinguished this case noting the corporate debtor had categorically contested and denied interest liability in both Section 8 notice reply and Section 9 application response. The disputed interest claim required adjudication by competent court, not CIRP initiation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754973</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>