https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754959 Section 34 interference was refused because the arbitral tribunal's reading of the contract and evidence on "welcome drink" reasonably covered the beverage and refreshing tissue, and the resulting production charges, service charges and service tax did not show patent illegality or rewriting of the contract. The GST objection also failed, as the tribunal's prior finding that GST was payable over and above production charges had attained finality and could not be reopened. Interest was sustained under Section 31(7) in the absence of a contractual bar, and costs were upheld under Section 31A as a proper exercise of discretion. The award was left undisturbed. en-us Mon, 01 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Jul 2024 13:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754959 Section 34 interference was refused because the arbitral tribunal's reading of the contract and evidence on "welcome drink" reasonably covered the beverage and refreshing tissue, and the resulting production charges, service charges and service tax did not show patent illegality or rewriting of the contract. The GST objection also failed, as the tribunal's prior finding that GST was payable over and above production charges had attained finality and could not be reopened. Interest was sustained under Section 31(7) in the absence of a contractual bar, and costs were upheld under Section 31A as a proper exercise of discretion. The award was left undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 01 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754959