<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (5) TMI 19 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37326</link>
    <description>The court confirmed the existence of a genuine firm during the assessment year 1972-73, ruling in favor of the assessee. It held that signing the partnership deed in dual capacities by one of the partners did not invalidate the partnership, citing relevant legal provisions and precedents. The court emphasized the legality of such arrangements and directed communication of the judgment to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 11:06:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75872" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (5) TMI 19 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37326</link>
      <description>The court confirmed the existence of a genuine firm during the assessment year 1972-73, ruling in favor of the assessee. It held that signing the partnership deed in dual capacities by one of the partners did not invalidate the partnership, citing relevant legal provisions and precedents. The court emphasized the legality of such arrangements and directed communication of the judgment to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>