<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 2059 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456151</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant, a consolidator, affirming the penalty imposed for exporting prohibited goods. The Tribunal concluded that the appellant failed to conduct the necessary inquiry before dispatching the consignment containing Red Sanders wood, a violation under the Wild Life Protection Act. The Tribunal upheld the penalty, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s duty to ensure compliance with export regulations. Despite arguments regarding the involvement of a Chinese individual, the Tribunal found sufficient circumstantial evidence of the appellant&#039;s awareness and responsibility, thereby confirming the original order and dismissing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2024 19:57:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=758714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 2059 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456151</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant, a consolidator, affirming the penalty imposed for exporting prohibited goods. The Tribunal concluded that the appellant failed to conduct the necessary inquiry before dispatching the consignment containing Red Sanders wood, a violation under the Wild Life Protection Act. The Tribunal upheld the penalty, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s duty to ensure compliance with export regulations. Despite arguments regarding the involvement of a Chinese individual, the Tribunal found sufficient circumstantial evidence of the appellant&#039;s awareness and responsibility, thereby confirming the original order and dismissing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456151</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>