<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1522 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456156</link>
    <description>Import of parts of air-pistols and airguns/rifles claimed exemption under Schedule I(III)(f) of the Arms Rules, 2016, raising the question whether a Form-X licence and inspection under Rule 88 were still required. The text notes that authorities and the DGFT were asked to place their stand on affidavit, while a police report in one matter recorded conformity with the invoices and indicated that the goods fell within the exempted category. In the connected matters, further inspection of the consignments was directed. The customs authorities were directed to consider release of the consignments within one week if there was no other objection, without awaiting further orders and without prejudice to the parties&#039; contentions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2024 19:57:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=758709" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1522 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456156</link>
      <description>Import of parts of air-pistols and airguns/rifles claimed exemption under Schedule I(III)(f) of the Arms Rules, 2016, raising the question whether a Form-X licence and inspection under Rule 88 were still required. The text notes that authorities and the DGFT were asked to place their stand on affidavit, while a police report in one matter recorded conformity with the invoices and indicated that the goods fell within the exempted category. In the connected matters, further inspection of the consignments was directed. The customs authorities were directed to consider release of the consignments within one week if there was no other objection, without awaiting further orders and without prejudice to the parties&#039; contentions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456156</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>