https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456150 Purchasers pendente lite in a suit for declaration of title based on an earlier registered will were not necessary or proper parties because they derived no independent legal footing beyond their transferors. Their purchase during the pendency of the suit attracted Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, so the alienation could not defeat the appellant's rights under the existing decree or justify their impleadment. A necessary party is one without whom complete adjudication is impossible, and a proper party is one whose presence is required for effective adjudication; on these facts, neither test was satisfied. en-us Fri, 02 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Jul 2024 17:13:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456150 Purchasers pendente lite in a suit for declaration of title based on an earlier registered will were not necessary or proper parties because they derived no independent legal footing beyond their transferors. Their purchase during the pendency of the suit attracted Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, so the alienation could not defeat the appellant's rights under the existing decree or justify their impleadment. A necessary party is one without whom complete adjudication is impossible, and a proper party is one whose presence is required for effective adjudication; on these facts, neither test was satisfied. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 02 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456150