<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 133 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754913</link>
    <description>ITAT Hyderabad allowed the appeal and restored the Trust&#039;s registration u/s 12AB. The CIT(E) had cancelled registration citing violations including non-intimation of trustee changes, unexplained security deposits, property development activities, and construction of Gosala. The Tribunal held that trustee appointments per Trust Deed are administrative matters not requiring departmental intimation. Property development with court permission under section 34 of Trust Act was permissible for Trust objects. The unexplained credit addition was under appeal and premature for cancellation purposes. Gosala construction qualified as advancement of general public utility. None of the cited reasons constituted specified violations under section 12AB(4), making the cancellation illegal and without merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2024 08:43:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=758572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 133 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754913</link>
      <description>ITAT Hyderabad allowed the appeal and restored the Trust&#039;s registration u/s 12AB. The CIT(E) had cancelled registration citing violations including non-intimation of trustee changes, unexplained security deposits, property development activities, and construction of Gosala. The Tribunal held that trustee appointments per Trust Deed are administrative matters not requiring departmental intimation. Property development with court permission under section 34 of Trust Act was permissible for Trust objects. The unexplained credit addition was under appeal and premature for cancellation purposes. Gosala construction qualified as advancement of general public utility. None of the cited reasons constituted specified violations under section 12AB(4), making the cancellation illegal and without merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754913</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>