<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellate Tribunal decides on Transfer Pricing issues incl. software services, guarantees, inter-company loans, &amp; brand royalties.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79049</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal addressed various Transfer Pricing (TP) issues. Regarding software services, the Tribunal upheld the selection of comparables by the assessee over the Transfer Pricing Officer&#039;s choices. The Tribunal also adjusted rates for guarantees provided to AEs based on performance and financial aspects. For inter-company loans, the Tribunal questioned the characterization as loans without considering the quasi-equity nature argued by the assessee. The Tribunal dismissed a claim for brand royalty fees, affirming that the brand is not owned by the assessee, hence no royalty is applicable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2024 08:43:41 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2024 08:43:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=758564" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellate Tribunal decides on Transfer Pricing issues incl. software services, guarantees, inter-company loans, &amp; brand royalties.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79049</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal addressed various Transfer Pricing (TP) issues. Regarding software services, the Tribunal upheld the selection of comparables by the assessee over the Transfer Pricing Officer&#039;s choices. The Tribunal also adjusted rates for guarantees provided to AEs based on performance and financial aspects. For inter-company loans, the Tribunal questioned the characterization as loans without considering the quasi-equity nature argued by the assessee. The Tribunal dismissed a claim for brand royalty fees, affirming that the brand is not owned by the assessee, hence no royalty is applicable.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2024 08:43:41 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79049</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>