<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellate Tribunal Orders Fresh Review on Transfer Pricing Adjustments, Comparable Selection, and Section 14A Disallowances.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79047</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal addressed several key issues. Firstly, on Transfer Pricing (TP) adjustment, it found errors in the CIT(A)&#039;s decision as rectification was only sought for professional fees, not ESOP, leading to a flawed dismissal. The Tribunal directed a fresh review by the CIT(A) with proper consideration and opportunity for the assessee. Secondly, on comparable selection, the CIT(A) erred by only addressing the validity of comparables, neglecting other raised issues. The Tribunal ordered a reevaluation by the CIT(A) on all grounds. Lastly, on disallowance u/s 14A, the Tribunal remitted the matter back to CIT(A) for a thorough review of dividend income and related expenditures, emphasizing due process. Additionally, on disallowance u.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2024 08:43:34 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2024 08:43:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=758560" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellate Tribunal Orders Fresh Review on Transfer Pricing Adjustments, Comparable Selection, and Section 14A Disallowances.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79047</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal addressed several key issues. Firstly, on Transfer Pricing (TP) adjustment, it found errors in the CIT(A)&#039;s decision as rectification was only sought for professional fees, not ESOP, leading to a flawed dismissal. The Tribunal directed a fresh review by the CIT(A) with proper consideration and opportunity for the assessee. Secondly, on comparable selection, the CIT(A) erred by only addressing the validity of comparables, neglecting other raised issues. The Tribunal ordered a reevaluation by the CIT(A) on all grounds. Lastly, on disallowance u/s 14A, the Tribunal remitted the matter back to CIT(A) for a thorough review of dividend income and related expenditures, emphasizing due process. Additionally, on disallowance u.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2024 08:43:34 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79047</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>