<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (7) TMI 46 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37308</link>
    <description>For capital computation under the Second Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, the relevant reserve was the amount actually reflected after adjusting the preceding year&#039;s general reserve for the debit balance in the profit and loss account. The balance-sheet and accounts showed that the Rs. 80 lakhs reserve stood reduced on that adjustment, leaving an available reserve of Rs. 36,11,279. The absence of a corresponding further book entry did not change the true position disclosed by the accounts, so the lower figure alone was to be taken for capital computation and the assessee&#039;s contention failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:24:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75854" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (7) TMI 46 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37308</link>
      <description>For capital computation under the Second Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, the relevant reserve was the amount actually reflected after adjusting the preceding year&#039;s general reserve for the debit balance in the profit and loss account. The balance-sheet and accounts showed that the Rs. 80 lakhs reserve stood reduced on that adjustment, leaving an available reserve of Rs. 36,11,279. The absence of a corresponding further book entry did not change the true position disclosed by the accounts, so the lower figure alone was to be taken for capital computation and the assessee&#039;s contention failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37308</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>