<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 99 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754879</link>
    <description>HC set aside tax order challenging GSTR discrepancies, directing petitioner to remit 10% of disputed tax demand and submit reply to show cause notice. Court mandated respondent to provide reasonable hearing and issue fresh order within three months, ensuring principles of natural justice are followed while allowing opportunity to contest tax demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 19:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=758430" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 99 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754879</link>
      <description>HC set aside tax order challenging GSTR discrepancies, directing petitioner to remit 10% of disputed tax demand and submit reply to show cause notice. Court mandated respondent to provide reasonable hearing and issue fresh order within three months, ensuring principles of natural justice are followed while allowing opportunity to contest tax demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754879</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>