<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 79 - ITAT Hyderabad</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754859</link>
    <description>ITAT Hyderabad dismissed assessee&#039;s claim for deduction u/s 54F of the Income Tax Act. The assessee claimed deduction for constructing a residential house on gifted land under Muslim Personal Law. However, the property was predominantly used for religious purposes including mosque, orphanage school, and staff quarters. The tribunal found the property did not qualify as a residential house under section 54F, noting contradictory statements about residential use and lack of evidence showing investment in residential construction. The tribunal ruled no pro-rata deduction was available and upheld the AO&#039;s order denying the deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2024 07:50:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=758398" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 79 - ITAT Hyderabad</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754859</link>
      <description>ITAT Hyderabad dismissed assessee&#039;s claim for deduction u/s 54F of the Income Tax Act. The assessee claimed deduction for constructing a residential house on gifted land under Muslim Personal Law. However, the property was predominantly used for religious purposes including mosque, orphanage school, and staff quarters. The tribunal found the property did not qualify as a residential house under section 54F, noting contradictory statements about residential use and lack of evidence showing investment in residential construction. The tribunal ruled no pro-rata deduction was available and upheld the AO&#039;s order denying the deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>