<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 68 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754848</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Principal Commissioner&#039;s order and granting consequential relief. It held that issuing a second show-cause notice for the same period, before adjudicating the first, was without jurisdiction and time-barred. The judgment emphasized adherence to legal procedures and principles of natural justice in adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2024 12:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=758381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 68 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754848</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Principal Commissioner&#039;s order and granting consequential relief. It held that issuing a second show-cause notice for the same period, before adjudicating the first, was without jurisdiction and time-barred. The judgment emphasized adherence to legal procedures and principles of natural justice in adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=754848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>